State Budget Lunacy!
State’s Office of Fiscal Analysis cannot
verify $1 Billion in Labor Savings!
Where Malloy’s
budget is built on speculation,
State employee
union contracts
- with a 9% wage increase and 4 year job guarantee -
are legally
binding documents!
The Federation of Connecticut Taxpayer Organizations
Contact Susan Kniep fctopresident@aol.com
860-841-8032, Tuesday, June 7, 2011
Are Increased
Property Taxes on the Horizon?
Meredith Whitney, who had predicted the banking collapse,
spoke to the issue of State Budgets: The Day of Reckoning
in 2010.
Today, in Fortune, according to Meredith Whitney: State finances are worse than ... estimated.
As noted “Whitney's latest report is even more thorough than last year's analysis that started the uproar. It
covers 25 of the largest states, adding ten new ones to the list, including Arizona, Nevada, Connecticut, and Wisconsin.
The problem starts with spending. Since 2003, state governments have raised
annual outlays from $1.5 trillion to almost $2.2 trillion, or $700 billion, yet
tax receipts have risen only $400 billion or $300
billion less, to $1.4 trillion. In fact, spending kept surging all during the
recession, while income from sales, income and corporate taxes went totally
flat in 2007.”
In reflecting on the aforementioned, State taxpayers can put
more faith in a snake oil salesman than in Governor Malloy’s budget as was
recently confirmed by the nonpartisan Office of Fiscal Analysis (OFA) in their
report issued yesterday as Analysts lack information to verify $1 billion in labor
savings. Throughout the OFA memo there
are more questions than answers on the validity of alleged union concessions
and savings. According to
CTMirror.org “Nonpartisan legislative
analysts say they can vouch for less than 40 percent of the $1.6 billion in
labor savings figured into the next biennial budget, and are unable to assess
the rest--more than $1 billion--because of unanswered questions or insufficient
data……. Legislative analysts were pressed for answers as the
Democrat-controlled House of Representatives debated another omnibus policy bill designed to
help implement the biennial budget adopted last month. The bill was
passed early Tuesday on an 83 to 63 vote.”
It is also apparent that state employee unions are in
absolute control as they drive the state budget process keeping the Governor,
the state legislature and taxpayers in suspense of their decision to accept or reject
Malloy’s lucrative offer on the table.
This is wrong. The
Governor and the State legislature must assume control of our State, its
finances, and its operations. This can
only be done by dramatic reforms to Collective Bargaining laws.
We have five years ahead of us as the Governor, the self
proclaimed son of organized labor, is eager to lock state taxpayers into a 9%
wage increase over 5 years, 4 years of
job guarantees, continued longevity pay, and enviable health and pension
benefits for state employee unions.
Where Malloy’s budget is
built on speculation, state employee union contracts are legally binding
documents.
If the Governor’s crystal ball needs an overhaul and his speculations
are wrong, he has limited choices he can make to fund these contracts. Those choices include cutting municipal aid
which will in turn lead to increased property taxes and/or possible layoffs of
municipal employees in the 169 towns throughout Connecticut.
It is those cuts to municipal aid which the Governor could
be anticipating when reflecting on his proposed reforms to state
law which now limits his ability to cut municipal aid without legislative
approval. In wanting to end legislative
oversight, the question is – when will municipal aid cuts be imposed – this
year, next year or in 3 years if the economy has not improved while there is a
lock on state employee union wage increases and job guarantees.
The benefactor of the Governor’s budget is no surprise to
many as public sector unions spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to put the
Governor in office. In contrast, the victims of Governor Malloy’s
budget are many to include private sector workers who have already joined the 9.1%
unemployed and the many that can be terminated
At-Will under the existing laws of our State. Neither the Governor nor the
Democrat-controlled state legislature gave them any consideration in this
legislative session. Instead, the
Governor imposed $1.5 billion in new taxes.
Adding to this fiscal debacle, CTNewsJunkie.com reports the
position of State Rep. Arthur O’Neill: Budget Sure to Bust Spending Cap.
Today, throwing caution to the wind, the House Passes Last Budget Implementer . which included
language bailing out Bridgeport’s
pensions and more.
As the House
passes bill to balance Conn. budget it included according to the
Record-Journal “a method for the General
Assembly to approve the tentative labor savings and concessions agreement,
should lawmakers choose to act on it. The approximately 45,000 unionized state
employees are not expected to finish voting on the deal until June 24, after
the legislature adjourns on June 8”.
Taxpayers should demand a vote by the legislature and hold
their legislators accountable on this lucrative union deal which could
ultimately drive up local property taxes.
As businesses weigh their future in Connecticut,
they are confronted with additional costs as Connecticut is the only state in the nation
to mandate paid sick leave. Bonnie Stewart, a vice president of
CBIA proclaimed…..This bill is a
travesty….. It's an incredible disappointment…..What this measure really does
is slam the door in the face of business.
Not lost among many concerned taxpayers is that a wave of increased
state taxes, property taxes, shuttered
businesses, and private sector layoffs may still be on the horizon if these state
employee union contracts are approved based on speculation.
******************************